| |
|
|
Criminal Cases Review Commission
- They did invite him to make further submissions in the light of Spackman’s imprisonment but again refused Kevin’s application and commented that it could not see how Spackman’s imprisonment affected the safety of Kevin’s conviction.
- There have been significant developments since the last CCRC refusal.
- Kevin and his defence team have had to do what the police and CCRC should have done (and are better equipped to do), and that is investigate evidence built on formidable details based on existing evidence that suggests other suspects for the Magill murder. When that evidence is tallied with the related developments arising from this sensitive material, the only logical conclusion that can be arrived at is that Kevin’s conviction is unsafe.
- Kevin is only too painfully aware from his previous dealings with the CCRC and Hertfordshire CPS that he is battling up hill and welcomes your support for Justice to be done.
|
|
|
|
|
