| |
|
|
Presumed Guilty
- The Crowns case was that Kevin Lane and Roger Vincent had gunned down Mr Magill and that Kevin was paid in cash on the same day for payment for shooting Mr Magill.
- The Crown has not yet to named the persons from whom Kevin received this alleged payment, nor were they able to substantiate other pieces of tenuous circumstantial evidence on which they relied.
- There was one strand of scientific evidence that concerned the discovery of Kevin’s fingerprint from a bin liner that was recovered from the boot of the car suggested to have been used in the murder.
- Although Kevin had a plausible innocent explanation for as to how his fingerprint may have got on to the bin liner, this strand of evidence does not place Kevin at the scene as one of the gunmen.
|
|
|
|
|
