| |
|
|
Presumed Guilty - I
- The Crowns case was that Kevin Lane and Roger Vincent had gunned
down Mr Magill and that Kevin was paid in cash on the same day for
payment for shooting Mr Magill.
- The
Crown has not yet to named the persons from whom Kevin received this
alleged payment, nor were they able to substantiate other pieces of
tenuous circumstantial evidence on which they relied.
- There
was one strand of scientific evidence that concerned the discovery of
Kevin’s fingerprint from a bin liner that was recovered from the boot
of the car suggested to have been used in the murder.
- Although
Kevin had a plausible innocent explanation for as to how his
fingerprint may have got on to the bin liner, this strand of evidence
does not place Kevin at the scene as one of the gunmen.
|
|
|
|
|
