| |
|
|
Khan And Bashir
- Although Spackman was not successful in persuading WPC Atkinson to change her evidence it does illustrate the arrogance he displayed throughout the case and the lengths he was prepared to go to ensure that Kevin got convicted. WPC Atkinson (pdf)
- Spackman was responsible for the investigation into Kevin’s finances during the period before the shooting.
- The Crowns case was that Kevin had no savings in UK Banks and that the money for a new car was paid for from the payment received for shooting Mr Magill. It was further submitted that Kevin had debts at the time.
- Kevin did have savings, but they were not kept in banks because he was concerned that the money would be seized by bailiffs acting for a company he was in dispute with over commercial premises he had leased.
|
|
|
|
|
